Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Millage increase fails by narrow margin of 16 votes

The debate over Mountain Home Public Schools’ millage increase is over.

Voters against the measure to increase the school’s millage rate squeaked out a narrow victory of 16 votes at the end of the night, sending the school district back to the drawing board on how to fix the major structural problems facing its high school.

The district had no other plans to address Mountain Home High Schools’ problems if the measure failed. An official comment from Mountain Home Superintendent Jake Long is expected to be released Wednesday morning, Aug 10.

Vote breakdown

A total of 3,200 votes were cast tonight, with one undervote in which a voter did not select an answer. Those in favor of the millage increase came in with 1,592 votes, and those against the measure reached 1,608 votes. All votes, except for one provisional ballot, have been counted.

This special election saw a turnout rate of around 14%. There are roughly 23,000 registered voters in the Mountain Home School District.

The millage increase seemed on track to pass tonight, with the ‘yes’ votes leading for the entirety of the night until the final set of votes from the Lakeview precinct that came in. Those votes broke against the district’s proposal 55 to 35, dashing the district’s plans to rebuild a portion of Mountain Home High School’s campus.

Those in the crowd during the counting of the votes Tuesday night, including school staff and young students, expressed disappointment upon learning the final vote.

A breakdown of each district can be seen below.

What’s next?

With the school district’s millage proposal defeated, the question remains on what to do about Mountain Home High School’s failing infrastructure.

With one roof well past the end of its lifecycle and the other reaching its replacement age, the district finds itself in a dilemma. They could attempt to do patchwork repairs, which would likely cost the district more money in the long run, or they could attempt to hold another special election on a smaller millage increase after working on a new set of construction plans. Another option may present itself at the next school board meeting.

Regardless of the district’s direction, the high school’s original 1966 roof will continue to loom over students’ heads as a dangerous fire hazard, potentially leading to future confrontations with Arkansas state inspectors.

If voters had approved the plan, Phase One would have seen the front office, three labs, six classrooms, a teacher’s lounge, and an additional pair of classrooms torn down to make way for a new two-story 117,000-square-foot building.

The new building would have boasted:

                2,800 feet of administrative space for staff members

                32 classrooms

                Two exterior classrooms

                New restrooms

                A 5,000-square-foot library

                A brand-new 12,800 cafeteria

                A 3,900-foot kitchen

Phase two of the project would have been smaller in scale, knocking down 84,000 square feet of the oldest section of the original 1966 building from the current cafeteria to the library.

That section would be replaced with a new two-story 125,200 square foot structure that would have featured:

                An additional 3,200 feet of administrative space

                12 more classrooms

                Two new labs focusing on electronics and agriculture

                4,500 square feet of Reserve Officers’ Training Corps space

                13,000 square feet of multipurpose space

                A 6,200-square-foot wrestling gymnasium

                A 4,200 dance studio

                Two full locker rooms for basketball and physical education

                62 new parking spaces

The district had also planned to convert the high school over to a traditional four-year model for students, but the Tuesday night defeat most likely means that that plan is potentially scrapped.

The school district has 48 hours to request and pay for a vote recount.

Why it failed

Recent increases in local sales taxes, property taxes, and a national recession are the most likely suspects in last night’s defeated millage increase.

Last year, the City of Mountain Home asked voters to approve two separate tax increases of 0.5% and 0.25%, respectively.

The 0.5% increase was for the cost of acquiring, constructing, furnishing, and equipping park and recreational facilities and improvements, including a multipurpose center with 30,000 square feet of community center space, 35,000 square feet of gym space, and a 33,000-square-foot indoor aquatic center, with a 10-lane swimming pool. An outdoor aquatic center would account for another 35,000 square feet.

The 0.25% tax increase went towards two purposes: “(a) to pay and secure the repayment of bonds approved by the voters and issued by the city from time to time to finance park and recreational facilities, and (b) to acquire, construct, improve, expand, equip, furnish, operate and maintain new or existing park and recreational facilities.”

The 0.5% increase is temporary, while the 0.25% tax increase is permanent.

Additionally, Mountain Home residents find themselves receiving another tax hike this year in the form of property taxes.

Updated property assessments were recently sent out to owners last month following the end of a five-year reappraisal cycle, with new appraisals to be reflected in property taxes for the 2023 fiscal year.

Baxter County has roughly 44,000 parcels of land in real estate property throughout the county. Of that number, 22,000 or so saw an increase in their appraised value, with some owners seeing their taxes doubled.

The new millage increase would have run taxpayers an average property tax increase of $45 per $100,000 of property value per year.

Election Results of Mountain Home Public Schools’ Millage Tax Increase August 2022

Note: These results are currently UNOFFICIAL with 1 provisional ballot remaining to be counted. Results are expected to be certified in 7-10 days.


YESNO
GRAND TOTALS1,5921,6083201 **1 “under vote”
———>49.8%50.2%100.0%
Grand total of Yes/No Votes in Mountain Home Public School District

Individual Precincts

Note: Part of Mountain Home Public Schools District is in Marion County. Their results are also listed below.


YESNOTotal Votes
ELECTION DAY TOTALS


Baxter County Courthouse **1 “under vote”279290570
———>48.9%50.9%99.8%
Marion County385391
———>41.8%58.2%100%
Lakeview City Hall355590
———>38.9%61.1%100.0%
Eastside Baptist Church161157318
———>50.6%49.4%100.0%
Henderson Fire Station62127
———>22.2%77.8%100.0%
Midway Safety Training Center265076
———>34.2%65.8%100.0%
Northeast Lakeside Fire Station5995154
———>38.3%61.7%100.0%
Election Commission Headquarters9591186
———>51.1%48.9%100.0%
ELECTION DAY TOTALS6998121512
———>46.2%53.7%99.9%
Election day totals for each precinct.

Early and Absentee Voting

EARLY VOTINGYESNO
Baxter County Courthouse6245861210
———>51.6%48.4%100.0%
Marion County7512
———>58.3%41.7%100.0%
Election Commission Headquarters247187434
———>56.9%43.1%100.0%
EARLY VOTING TOTALS8787781656
———>53.0%47.0%100.0%




ABSENTEE TOTALS151833
———>45.5%54.5%100.0%
Early voting and absentee voter breakdown.

Local Mountain Home, AR News



© 2022 Mountain Home Observer. All Rights Reserved.